Abstract: This article compares clinical function rehabilitation of two different types of feeding device 1. Ready made obturator & 2. Custom obturator. Material and methods: 10 neonates baby reported to the Department of Pediatricsdepartment alhammadi hospital KSA with congenital cleft palate will be selected for study. Feeding device will be constructed for each baby & readymade feeding bottle will be getting. Comparison between both is done by fixing volume & measuringfeeding time
Atito, E. (2000). Comparison Between Two Types of Feeding Obturators in Cleft Palate Babies. Al-Azhar Journal of Dentistry, 4(3), 297-301. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2017.5270
MLA
Ehab Atito. "Comparison Between Two Types of Feeding Obturators in Cleft Palate Babies", Al-Azhar Journal of Dentistry, 4, 3, 2000, 297-301. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2017.5270
HARVARD
Atito, E. (2000). 'Comparison Between Two Types of Feeding Obturators in Cleft Palate Babies', Al-Azhar Journal of Dentistry, 4(3), pp. 297-301. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2017.5270
VANCOUVER
Atito, E. Comparison Between Two Types of Feeding Obturators in Cleft Palate Babies. Al-Azhar Journal of Dentistry, 2000; 4(3): 297-301. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2017.5270